Representative Matters

  • Universal Protein Supplements Corporation vs. Dalech LLC, NAF Claim No. FA0908001278030 (2009) (Pfeuffer, Arb.). Attorney for petitioner in contested Uniform Dispute Resolution Action before the National Arbitration Forum (UDRP). Award: Domain name transferred.
  • General Council of the Assemblies of God vs. DomCollect Worldwide Intellectual Property AG, NAF Claim No. FA0904001259727 (2009) (Yachnin, Arb.). Attorney for petitioner in contested Uniform Dispute Resolution Action before the National Arbitration Forum (UDRP). Award: Domain name transferred.
  • AFN Broker LLC vs. Champion Performance Products, Inc. Attorney for petitioner in likelihood of confusion dispute. Settled.
  • The General Council of the Assemblies of God, DBA Gospel Publishing House vs. GPH Investments Incorporated. Attorney for opposer in likelihood of confusion dispute. Application withdrawn. Case dismissed.
  • The General Council of the Assemblies of God, DBA Gospel Publishing House vs. GPH Partners, LLC. Attorney for potential opposer in likelihood of confusion dispute. Settled.
  • Linda S. Potter vs. Stephanie Flanagan, NAF Claim No. FA0801001139692 (2008) (Johnson, Arb.). Attorney for petitioner in Uniform Dispute Resolution Action before the National Arbitration Forum (UDRP). Award: Domain name transferred.
  • In re Surveys & Forecasts, LLC. Attorney for appellant in ex parte appeal of genericness refusal. Refusal withdrawn. Appeal terminated.
  • Los Angeles Lakers, Inc. vs. Margaret Kilbane. Attorney for potential defendant in likelihood of confusion dispute. Settled.
  • CAPSIM Management Simulations, Inc. formerly Park Li Management Simulations, Inc. vs. The Fund for American Studies. Attorney for opposer in likelihood of confusion dispute. Opposition sustained.
  • Universal Protein Supplements Corporation d/b/a Universal Nutrition vs. Natural Organics Inc.Attorney for petitioner in likelihood of confusion dispute. Settled.
  • CAPSIM Management Simulations, Inc. vs. Sharon Bender. Attorney for opposer in likelihood of confusion dispute. Opposition sustained.
  • Universal Protein Supplements Corporation DBA Universal Nutrition vs. Discovery Communications, Inc. Attorney for potential opposer in likelihood of confusion dispute. Settled.
  • Hormel Foods Corporation vs. The Creative Concept. Attorney for potential defendant in likelihood of confusion dispute. Settled.
  • Entoleter LLC vs. Grain Machinery Mfg. Corp. Attorney for defendant in likelihood of confusion dispute. Opposition withdrawn pursuant to settlement.
  • Park Li Management Simulations, Inc. d/b/a Management Simulations vs. Interpretive Software, Inc. Attorney for opposer in likelihood of confusion dispute. Settled.
  • Park Li Management Simulations, Inc. v. Interpretive Software, Inc., Case No. 1:05-cv-06627 (N.D. Ill. Settled May 16, 2007). Attorney for plaintiff/counter-defendant in suit alleging trademark infringement with Anti-Cybersquatting Act counterclaim.
  • In re James J. O’Brien. Attorney for appellant in ex parte appeal of likelihood of confusion refusal. Refusal withdrawn. Appeal terminated.
  • Park Li Management Simulation, Inc. vs. LaPorte Holdings, Inc., NAF Claim No. FA0411000363984 (2005) (Yachnin, Arb.). Attorney for petitioner in Uniform Dispute Resolution Action before the National Arbitration Forum (UDRP). Award: Domain name transferred.
  • In re Donna Lee Murphree. Attorney for appellant in ex parte appeal of identification refusal. Amendment filed. Appeal terminated.
  • Revolution, Incorporated v. Revolution Bodywear, Incorporated et al., Case No. 4:05-cv-40083 (E.D. Mich. Settled August 3, 2005). Subsequent attorney for defendant in suit alleging breach of prior settlement of Lanham Act suit.
  • The North Face Apparel Corp. vs. Xueyan Liu. Attorney for defendant in likelihood of confusion dispute. Settled.
  • K-2 CORPORATION vs. Xueyan Liu. Attorney for defendant in likelihood of confusion dispute. Settled.
  • Universal Nutrition v. Carbolite Foods, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:03-cv-03265 (D. N.J. Stipulated Dismissal September 20, 2004). Member of plaintiff’s team of attorneys in Lanham Act suit.
  • In re Robert J. Dunn. Attorney for appellant in ex parte appeal of likelihood of confusion refusal. Refusal withdrawn. Appeal terminated.
  • In re Continuum Care Corp., App. No. 75026799 (TTAB 2001). Attorney for USPTO in ex parteappeal of USPTO’s genericness refusal. TTAB affirmed USPTO genericness refusal