Mr. Sharp has handled matters in a wide variety of biotechnology disciplines, such as:
- Pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals and gene therapy.
- Recombinant nucleic acid technologies, including plant biotechnology.
- In-vivo and in-vitro diagnostic and gene-sequencing methods.
He has also gained successful outcomes in diverse chemical and chemical engineering technologies, including:
- Organic, inorganic and metallurgical chemistry.
- Chemical and metallurgical processing.
- Food and beverage chemistry.
Beyond his extensive prosecution and opinion experience in these technologies and applications, Mr. Sharp has participated in numerous inter partes patent matters including patent infringement litigation before U.S. District Courts, patent interference proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and patent opposition work before foreign patent offices.
In addition to his Martindale-Hubbell® AV Peer Review Rating™, Mr. Sharp has been selected by the Chicago Law Bulletin’s Leading Lawyer Network as a "Leading Lawyer." In recognition of his outstanding patent work in life sciences, Mr. Sharp has been featured as a Life Sciences Star in Managing Intellectual Property’s LMG Life Sciences, 2012. He was also selected for inclusion in the 2013 Illinois Super Lawyers® list. Only five percent of the lawyers in the state were selected for this honor. In 2013, he was selected as a "Top Rated Lawyer in Intellectual Property" by American Lawyer Media (ALM) and Martindale-Hubbell and as an IP Star in Managing IP’s 2013 World IP Handbook and Survey.
Mr. Sharp received his J.D. from the University of Georgia School of Law in 1984. He received his B.S.E. in Chemical Engineering from Princeton University in 1980.
- "Sharp Wants a Paperless Office," Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Law Firm Leaders, April 17, 2012 (interview).
- "Patent Law Sizzles Amid IP Boom," Crain’s Chicago Business, October 3, 2011 (featured quotes).
- Co-author, "Challenges of Intellectual Property and Branding on Regulatory Approvals," chapter for Nutraceutical and Functional Food Regulations in the United States and Around the World (Academic Press, July 2008).
- Chair, Board of Directors of the PilotLegis RPG
- Senior Trustee and former Chairman, Board of Trustees of The Latin School of Chicago
- Mentor at the mentorship academy of the Chicago Committee on Minorities in Large Law Firms
- Executives' Club of Chicago
- The Economic Club of Chicago
- Co-Class Agent for his Princeton class
- Previously: Chairman of the Committee to Nominate Alumni Trustees for Princeton University and President of The Princeton Club of Chicago
Clients have benefited from Mr. Sharp’s representation in the following cases:
Accu-cut Diamond Tool Company, Inc.* v. Sunnen Products Company
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Case Type(s): Patent Infringement
Area(s) of practice: Mechanical Arts
Eicholz (Amersham)* v. Tyagi
U.S. Patent Office Board of Appeals and Interferences
Case Type(s): Patent Interference
Area(s) of practice: Biotechnology
Elsbach (Monsanto)* v. Scott
U.S. Patent Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
Case Type(s): Patent Interference, Appeal
Area(s) of practice: Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology
Fraley (Monsanto)* v. Zambryski v. Anderson
U.S. Patent Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
Case Type(s): Patent Interference
Area(s) of practice: Biotechnology
Hooykaas v. Shewmaker (Monsanto)*
U.S. Patent Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
Case Type(s): Patent Interference
Area(s) of practice: Biotechnology
Hybritech v. Abbott Laboratories*
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Type(s): Patent Infringement, Appeal
Area(s) of practice: Biotechnology
Kishore (Monsanto)* v. Burrell
U.S. Patent Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
Case Type(s): Patent Interference
Area(s) of practice: Biotechnology
McNeil-PPC, Inc. v. The Procter & Gamble Company*
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Type(s): Patent Infringement
Area(s) of practice: Chemistry/Chemical Engineering
Schilperoort v. Rogers (Monsanto)* v. Barton v. Zambryski
U.S. Patent Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
Case Type(s): Patent Interference
Area(s) of practice: Biotechnology
Shell Oil Company v. Union Carbide Company*
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana
Case Type(s): Patent Interference, Patent Infringement
Area(s) of practice: Chemistry/Chemical Engineering
Stalker v. Kishore (Monsanto)*
U.S. Patent Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
Case Type(s): Patent Interference
Area(s) of practice: Biotechnology
*Party Represented
Short Biography