Biography
Sandip Patel advises companies in the chemical and life sciences industries on high-stakes patent matters, from securing and managing valuable patent portfolios to resolving complex disputes globally. His practice encompasses all aspects of patent law, including patent prosecution, portfolio strategy, opinion counseling, Patent Trial and Appeal Board proceedings, federal court litigation, and foreign opposition and litigation matters.
With experience spanning the full spectrum of patent practice, Sandip brings a uniquely comprehensive perspective to the challenges facing innovative companies. He regularly helps clients navigate matters in the United States and key international jurisdictions, including Australia, China, Europe, and Japan. Clients rely on his deep experience to develop practical solutions to their most significant intellectual property challenges.
After graduating from Indiana University’s Maurer School of Law, Sandip joined Marshall Gerstein, where he was trained by a group of the firm’s leading patent lawyers, working at the cutting edge of the law, biotech, and chemical sciences. As their apprentice, he learned to write and prosecute patent applications in ways that strategically strengthened patent portfolios for multinational corporations, including BASF, British Petroleum, International Paper, Pfizer, Raytheon, and SK Hynix. Sandip developed a reputation for helping inventors articulate and protect their most important innovations. He worked closely with them to ensure their patents not only secure meaningful protection but also withstand challenges in adversarial proceedings and rigorous foreign opposition systems. Today, he applies those same principles in mentoring the next generation of Marshall Gerstein attorneys, helping them develop the skills necessary to counsel innovators and build strong, defensible patent portfolios.
Early in his career, Sandip built a foundation in both patent litigation and Patent Office contested proceedings. He worked on federal court matters for companies such as Amgen and Procter & Gamble, gaining experience in discovery, trial preparation, and dispute resolution strategy. At the same time, he developed extensive experience in Patent Office interferences, helping clients protect innovations ranging from early cancer treatments and genetically modified plants to technologies found in everyday consumer products.
Over the past two decades, Sandip has continued to lead complex contested proceedings on behalf of ACCO Brands, Gillette, Monsanto, Newell Rubbermaid, and Pharmacia & Upjohn, as well as numerous emerging companies and universities.
Today, Sandip provides strategic counseling in all areas of patent law, with a particular focus on proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), including America Invents Act (AIA) trials whose procedural framework evolved from earlier interference practice. He has spent much of the past decade helping clients, including a Nobel Laureate, develop and protect worldwide patent portfolios covering foundational CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technologies. This includes counseling in multiple foreign oppositions and U.S. patent interferences.
In these matters and many others, Sandip has worked closely with leading IP practitioners in the United States and abroad to develop coordinated strategies for protecting and enforcing valuable innovations across the globe.
Sandip has a formal education in chemical engineering from Michigan State University (Go Green!), but his work has spanned the entire spectrum of engineering, chemical, and life sciences. Through that experience, he has proven adept at quickly grasping diverse technologies and devising efficient intellectual property strategies that clients have used to achieve their business objectives.
He is thankful for the many clients who have sought his advice for nearly 30 years, and the clients and peers who have recognized his work through honors such as:
- "Notable Practitioner" in the 2025 Chambers USA Guide
- IAM Patent 1000: The World’s Leading Patent Professionals 2025
- Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers (since 2024)
- Lawdragon 500 Leading Litigators in America (since 2022)
- “Leading Lawyer” per Law Bulletin Media’s Leading Lawyers division (since 2019)
- Best Lawyers in America® (since 2016)
- “IP Star” in the Managing Intellectual Property IP Stars Survey (since 2016)
- “Life Sciences Star” per LMG Life Sciences (since 2016)
- Illinois Super Lawyers® (since 2013)
In addition to his client work, Sandip has been deeply involved in the leadership of Marshall Gerstein, having chaired the firm’s attorney recruiting committee for 10 years, helping attract and develop generations of attorneys, and later served for six years on the executive committee, where he contributed to the firm’s strategic planning and governance.
Representative Experience
- Counseled clients in dozens of inter partes matters in the Patent Office in a variety of sciences including:
- biotechnology (e.g., antibody formulations, avirulent vaccines, DNA sequencing methods, fundamental CRISPR technologies, genetically-engineered plants, and kerotinocyte growth factors)
- chemistry/chemical engineering (e.g., pharmaceutical compounds and compositions, food processing chemicals, and chemical and biochemical reactor design and operation)
- mechanical engineering (e.g., railcar shock absorbers, correction-tape dispensers, paper shredders, computer locks, hand held razors, and baby diapers)
- electrical engineering (e.g., piezoelectric ink-jet printers, process control systems and software)
- Counseled clients in patent infringement actions in the federal courts involving:
- biotechnology patents (e.g., antibody formulations, recombinant growth hormone, recombinant erythropoietin)
- pharmaceutical chemistry patents (e.g., platinum coordination compounds and methods of treating cancerous tumors)
- chemical engineering patents (e.g., air pollution control processes and equipment, reaction engineering and reactor design)
- mechanical engineering (e.g., personal care devices, such as razors and feminine care products, computer locks, and smart device stands/platforms)
- Prepared and prosecuted to issuance patent applications concerning, for example:
- consumer products (e.g., baby diapers, feminine hygiene products, dish and laundry cleaning compositions, pens, inks, paints)
- industrial products (e.g., semiconductors, construction materials)
- reaction engineering processes (e.g., catalytic reactors, biochemical reactors, industrial gas combustion turbines, sulfonation processes)
- chemical compositions and processes (e.g., superabsorbent polymers, commodity chemicals, cleaning solvents)
- pharmaceutical compositions and associated manufacturing methods (e.g., taxol formulations, antibody formulations, central nervous system analgesics)
Background and Credentials
Sandip has been a partner of the firm since 2002, having joined as an associate following his graduation from law school in 1996. While at the firm, he has drafted and prosecuted hundreds of patent applications, and has served as counsel in dozens of contested proceedings in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and in associated appeals, and as counsel in a number of patent cases in the federal courts. Sandip also served as chairperson of the firm’s Attorney Recruiting Committee for ten years, and later served for six years on the firm's Executive Committee.
Sandip received his J.D. from Indiana University Maurer School of Law, in Bloomington, Indiana, in 1996. During law school, he served as a Notes and Comments Editor of the Indiana Law Journal. He received a B.S. degree (with honors) in chemical engineering from Michigan State University in 1993.
Education
- Indiana University Maurer School of Law (Bloomington) (J.D.)
- Served as Notes and Comments Editor of the Indiana Law Journal
- Michigan State University (B.S., with honors)
- Chemical Engineering
Bar Admissions
Publications and Presentations
- "Appeals Against CNIPA Invalidation Decisions: Representative Cases," Managing IP, April 14, 2026.
- "Overturning Chinese Invalidation Decisions: Timelines and Procedures," Managing IP, March 23, 2026.
- “The Pros and Cons of Levying Value-Based Fees on Patents,” Law360, September 18, 2025.
- "Federal Circuit Holds Recoverability of Attorney’s Fees Does Not Extend to AIA Trials," IP Litigator, July 1, 2024.
- "Potentially Poisonous Patents," AUTM Insight, May 3, 2024.
Representative Inter Partes Matters
AbbVie Inc. v. Amgen Inc.*
U.S. District Court, District of Delaware
Biotechnology (BPCIA)
Coca Cola Inc. v. The Procter & Gamble Company*
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Inter partes Reexamination
Chemistry
Opposition and Appeal re: Baxter International Inc.* & Baxter Healthcare S.A.*
Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
Patent Opposition and Appeal
Chemical Engineering
Stevens (Newell Rubbermaid Inc.)* v. Tamai (Seed Rubber Company)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Patent Interference Appeal
Mechanical Engineering
The Broad Institute, Inc., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and President and Fellows of Harvard College v. The Regents of the University of California, University of Vienna, and Emmanuelle Charpentier*
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Patent Interference
CRISPR-Cas9 technology
*Party Represented
Community and Professional Involvement
- American Bar Association
- American Intellectual Property Law Association